Legal Opinion

Flanders v. O'Brien

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Hamilton Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant ahd others, to reform a mortgage executed by one James O’Brien to the plaintiff) and to foreclose the same. There are three tracts of land mentioned in the mortgage, ■one of which is the south-east quarter of a designated section, and it is alleged that the south-west quarter of the section was intended. The appellant was made a defendant, because he was the owner, by assignment, of several judg*285ments which had been rendered against the mortgagor after the execution of the mortgage. The only question in the case is, whether the mistake…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Sample v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Busenbarke v. RameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Figart v. HaldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Tuttle v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Boyd v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rooker v. RookerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API