Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Fearnaw

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court. .

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The object of this action was to set aside a sheriff’s sale of, and to quiet the title to, a tract of land. Harrison Fearnaw was the plaintiff, and James E. Armstrong the defendant, below.

The complaint was in two paragraphs, each describing the same transaction somewhat differently, but, in their legal import substantially the same.

The defendant demurred to each paragraph of the complaint, but his demurrer was overruled as to both paragraphs.

Issue being joined, the court heard the evidence and made a finding of the facts out of which the controversy between the parties had arisen. Upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wharton v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foltz v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Shirk v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McNamee v. RauckIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jones v. RhoadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Huffman v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API