Moore v. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court for the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Charles P. Oi'r, Judge. Action by Lucile W. Moore against Alexander P. Moore. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This action is in assumpsit. The contract declared on was made by the parties in their relation of husband and wife. It was entered into when they were living separate and apart and hears date the day following the institution of proceed*498ings by the wife for divorce from her husband. The contract is under seal, recites the marriage and pendency, of divorce proceedings, and contains two undertakings on the part of the husband. The first is, that the husband shall pay his wife “for counsel fees, expenses and alimony, pendente lite, the sum of seventy-five ($75) dollars a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daniels v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Barngrover v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Maull v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Logan v. MathewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yates v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Landa v. AstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Dixon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Spreckels v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Kroll v. KrollNew York Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.