Legal Opinion

Kroll v. Kroll

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Rabin, J.

Motion by plaintiff husband for judgment on the pleadings on his first cause of action, or, in the alternative, for similar relief on his second cause of action.

The substance of the first cause of action is that a separation agreement (which is annexed to and made a part thereof) entered into between the parties on September 23, 1955 is contrary to public policy and void. The second cause of action incorporates by reference the pertinent allegations of the first and challenges the validity of the agreement on the ground that paragraph 14 thereof provides for a forfeiture or penalty thus…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of RhinelanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Schley v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Yates v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Schiff v. SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Lake v. LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kromberg v. KrombergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Carluccio v. CarluccioNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API