Legal Opinion
Landa v. Astin
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 29, 1951No. 10843_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The parties to this action were married in 1930. In-1937 they separated, and four, years later they decided to obtain a divorce. Pursuant to that decision, three agreements were executed, dated December 1, 1941. The first two need not detain us: they provided, among other things, for the wife’s support pending the divorce, for monthly payments of $150 during the husband’s lifetime until remarriage of the wife, and -for a mutual settlement and release of property rights. The third agreement, entitled “Note Agreement,” gave rise to the present suit. It recited that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Landa v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. AstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Moore v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Landa v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. AstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Travis v. TravisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.