Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. The ground of the motion for new trial complaining that the court overruled the motion to continue is without merit, when it did not unequivocally appear that the witness whose absence was the basis of the motion for continuance had been subpoenaed, counsel for the accused not asking that an attachment issue against the witness, but requesting the court to have a subpoena issued, requiring the absent witness to appear at once, and to have an officer serve it; the witness living in a county adjoining the county of the trial; it further appearing that in overruling the motion the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Durousseau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- New v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Buel v. Van NessSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Caison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Raleigh v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Britten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Grantham Transfer Co. v. HawesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Callaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Orange v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.