Orange v. State

So far as the general grounds are concerned, the evidence which we have set out at length is clearly sufficient to sustain the verdict of conviction. Indeed, the attorney for the appellant does not argue to the contrary. It therefore follows that unless there is some meritorious contention in one or more of the special grounds, the judgment should be affirmed. We will look into them in their order.

Special ground 1 assigns error because the court refused to give the following request to charge: “I charge you that where there is evidence showing insanity prior to the commission of the crime,…