Legal Opinion
United States v. Stanley Lilly Romulus, A/K/A Frank Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1991No. 91-5390PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINS, Circuit Judge:
Stanley Lilly Romulus appeals his conviction of and sentence for possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute. Romulus, who was a juvenile when he committed the offense, principally argues that the district court failed to make findings required by 18 U.S.C.A. § 5032 (West 1985 & Supp.1991) to support its decision to transfer him for adult prosecution. We agree. This matter is remanded in order for the district court to make additional findings and to reconsider its transfer decision. Romulus’ remaining assignments of error lack merit.
I
On the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Andrew StroudCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ramon Rodriguez-Gonzalez and Reuben Vargas-SantanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Charles E. IsomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Junaidu SavageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Dwight P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.