Legal Opinion
United States v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 6, 2001No. 98-4155, 98-4177 and 98-4192PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined.
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, Roger Winfred Stewart, Dennever Livingston, and Junior Anthony Simms (collectively, “Appellants”), raise numerous challenges to their convictions and sentences following a federal jury trial in which each was found guilty of various charges related to money laundering and/or drug trafficking. 1 Finding no reversible error with respect to Simms, we affirm his…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Russell Lee EbersoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Fink v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- United States v. Gwendolyn Cheek HedgepethCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.