United States v. Charles E. Isom
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Charles Isom appeals the sentence imposed after he was convicted of one count of dealing with counterfeit obligations. 18 U.S.C. § 473. Isom contends that because the jury acquitted him of the accompanying count of counterfeiting itself, 18 U.S.C. § 371, it was error for the district court to enhance his sentence on the basis that he had actually printed the counterfeit obligations.
Isom worked at a print shop where he operated a printing press. In early June of 1988, Jeffrey Riddel asked Isom if he would be interested in working for him at a print shop he was opening.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Martin SweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Esau Juarez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David Meade BernardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Arthur HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gerard Peter MocciolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.