Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles E. Isom

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1989No. 88-5650PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:

Charles Isom appeals the sentence imposed after he was convicted of one count of dealing with counterfeit obligations. 18 U.S.C. § 473. Isom contends that because the jury acquitted him of the accompanying count of counterfeiting itself, 18 U.S.C. § 371, it was error for the district court to enhance his sentence on the basis that he had actually printed the counterfeit obligations.

Isom worked at a print shop where he operated a printing press. In early June of 1988, Jeffrey Riddel asked Isom if he would be interested in working for him at a print shop he was opening.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin SweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Esau Juarez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. David Meade BernardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Arthur HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Gerard Peter MocciolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API