State v. Muller
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Cnrt Muller, the proprietor of a laundry, was convicted of requiring a woman employed in his establishment to work more than ten hours therein during a stated day, and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chiee Justice Bean
delivered the opinion.
In 1903 the legislature passed an act which, among other things, provided that “no female [shall] be employed in any mechanical establishment, or factory, or laundry in this State more than 10 hours during any one day” and that “any employer who shall require any female to work in any of the places mentioned” more than the prohibited time “shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be” punished, etc.: Laws 1903, p. 148. The defendant was convicted for a violation of this act by requiring a female to work more than the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Savage v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.