Legal Opinion

State v. Christiansen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2007No. 33527PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for arson. The fire started in the defendant’s leased business premises. The defendant seeks a new trial based upon misconduct by the prosecuting attorney in eliciting inadmissible evidence by seeking to lay the foundation for expert testimony by a police officer that in his opinion the defendant was deceptive during police interrogation and in eliciting testimony from the officer that the defendant refused to consent to a search of his business premises. We find the prosecutorial misconduct harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API