Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Payzant

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1978No. 77-3578, CA 8803Published

1DissentThornton, J.

The issue presented here is this:

Does the grand jury have authority to investigate and indict for lesser categories of public offenses, such as a "violation,” or is it limited to felonies and misdemeanors? The majority would apply the definition of a "crime” in ORS 161.515* 1 to the phrase "crimes *375committed or triable in the county” as used in ORS 132.310 et seq, thus precluding the grand jury from indicting for a "violation.”

While I recognize that a strong argument can be made for the majority’s conclusion, I am more persuaded by the opposite view, namely, that the grand jury may indict for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. Oregon City Elks Lodge No. 1189Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Banif Corporation v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API