Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Nagy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 21, 1984No. 2418PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants have appealed1 from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff in an action on a promissory note.
The defendants’ claims of error attack the findings of fact of the trial court. The Supreme Court has repeatedly criticized and attempted, apparently in vain, to discourage this misuse of the appellate process. Baker v. Baker, 166 Conn. 476, 478, 352 A.2d 277 (1974); South*449ern New England Contracting Co. v. State, 165 Conn. 644, 646, 345 A.2d 550 (1974); Pawlinski v. Allstate Ins. Co., 165 Conn. 1, 3, 327 A.2d 583 (1973). Questions of fact are to be determined solely by the trial court.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Southern New England Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Dubicki v. DubickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gennarini Construction Co. v. Messina Painting & Decorating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Fukelman v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Gennarini Construction Co. v. Messina Painting & Decorating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- American Frozen Foods, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 145Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Rodziewicz v. GiguereConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.