Legal Opinion
Gennarini Construction Co. v. Messina Painting & Decorating Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 20, 1985No. 3609PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion to confirm an arbitration award and denying the plaintiffs application to vacate the award.
The trial court found the following facts: The plaintiff contractor entered into a subcontract with the defendant subcontractor to do painting work on a public project. A dispute arose because of the defendant’s use of nonunion painters. The defendant completed the subcontract in a timely fashion, and the architect and public authority accepted the project.
The defendant claimed that money was due it on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Schwarzschild v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Waterbury Board of Education v. Waterbury Teachers Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Montanaro Brothers Builders, Inc. v. SnowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Chase Brass & Copper Workers Union Local 1565Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Hartford v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 760Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. Council 4Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- City of Hartford v. Local 760, International Ass'n of FirefightersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Gennarini Construction Co. v. Messina Painting & Decorating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Wolf v. GouldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.