Legal Opinion

Blair v. City of Hannibal

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 13, 2016No. Case No. 2:15CV00061 ERWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*906MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings ' [ECF No. 19].

I. BACKGROUND.Plaintiffs Jacob Blair and Sarah Blair (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Class Action Complaint in this Court on August 25, 2015, against Defendants City of Hannibal (“Hannibal”), Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. (“Redflex”) and Does 1 through 24 alleging Hannibal’s red light camera program is unconstitutional [ECF No. 1]. On November 16, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint against…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corporate Claims Mgmt., Inc. v. Shaiper (In re Patriot Nat'l Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  2. CST Industries, Inc. v. Tank Connections, L.L.CDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  3. Femmer v. Sephora USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Robertson v. Whitestone Home Furnishings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API