State v. Spearman.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
MCKENNA, J.
I. Introduction
At issue in this appeal is whether double jeopardy 1 bars the re-proseeution of a defendant for violating Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 291E-61 (2007 & Supp. 2009) 2 (“Operating a Vehicle under the Influence of an Intoxicant” or “OVUII”), following a “judgment of acquittal” on the HRS § 291E-61(a)(3) method of proof in an initial trial in which both HRS §§ 291E-61(a)(1) and (a)(3) methods of proof were tried. We reaffirm that a “judgment of acquittal” on the HRS § 291E-61(a)(3) method of proof in an OVUII trial is “in form only,” but that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MezurashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NakanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Codiamat.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. TerasakoHawaii Supreme Court · 2016