Legal Opinion

State v. Spearman.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000702PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MCKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

At issue in this appeal is whether double jeopardy 1 bars the re-proseeution of a defendant for violating Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 291E-61 (2007 & Supp. 2009) 2 (“Operating a Vehicle under the Influence of an Intoxicant” or “OVUII”), following a “judgment of acquittal” on the HRS § 291E-61(a)(3) method of proof in an initial trial in which both HRS §§ 291E-61(a)(1) and (a)(3) methods of proof were tried. We reaffirm that a “judgment of acquittal” on the HRS § 291E-61(a)(3) method of proof in an OVUII trial is “in form only,” but that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. MezurashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NakanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Codiamat.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. TerasakoHawaii Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API