Legal Opinion

State v. Nakano

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2013No. SCWC-12-0000106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RECKTENWALD, C.J.

Daniel S. Nakano was charged with Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII) in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 291E-61(a)(l), (a)(3), and (b)(1). Nakano entered a conditional no contest plea as to HRS § 291E-61(a)(1), conditioned on his ability to appeal on the ground that the charge was defective because it did not allege a state of mind. The State consented to the conditional plea. Although Nakano’s written submission of plea form contained a conditional plea only to the HRS § 291E-61(a)(l) method of proof, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Garcia.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API