State v. Nakano
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
RECKTENWALD, C.J.
Daniel S. Nakano was charged with Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII) in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 291E-61(a)(l), (a)(3), and (b)(1). Nakano entered a conditional no contest plea as to HRS § 291E-61(a)(1), conditioned on his ability to appeal on the ground that the charge was defective because it did not allege a state of mind. The State consented to the conditional plea. Although Nakano’s written submission of plea form contained a conditional plea only to the HRS § 291E-61(a)(l) method of proof, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Garcia.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015