Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Stinchcomb
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ray M. Wright, Inc. and others (collectively referred to as ‘Wright”), are a group of corporate homebuilders. Defendant (Dan Stinchcomb) is a real estate developer, who agreed to sell Wright 116 lots in a subdivision in Fayette County. Under the agreement, Wright paid Stinchcomb $10,000 in earnest money and purchased 71 of the lots. Wright brought this action against Stinchcomb for specific performance of his agreement to sell Wright the remaining 45 lots. The trial court ruled that Stinchcomb is entitled to summary judgment because Wright did not tender the purchase…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCoy v. West Building Materials of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Pace Construction Corp. v. Houdaille-Duval-Wright Division, Houdaille Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Benedict v. SneadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- English v. MullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Schaffer v. City of MariettaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Champion Windows of Chattanooga, LLC v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Bourke v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Stinchcomb v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Miller v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Harrison v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.