Legal Opinion

Schaffer v. City of Marietta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1996No. A95A2082PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

The City of Marietta brought this interpleader action to determine who was entitled to Howard Schaffer’s retirement benefits after his death. His widow, Virginia Schaffer, contends the survivor’s benefits are payable to Howard Schaffer’s estate, and his brother, Bud Schaffer, claims he is the beneficiary. After a bench trial, the court found Mrs. Schaffer, as remainder beneficiary under the will, was entitled to the benefits, and Bud Schaffer appeals.

The underlying facts in this case are undisputed. Howard Schaffer, as an employee of the City of Marietta, participated in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooke v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Nash v. TinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sam's Wholesale Club v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Brandenburg v. All-Fleet Refinishing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Perdue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API