Legal Opinion
Moreno v. Venturini
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1969No. Civ. 33866PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
On September 11, 1964, appellant commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries 1 sustained in a collision between his automobile and a truck owned by respondent Michael Flynn Mfg. Co. and driven by respondent Joe Venturini. Respondents filed an answer generally denying negligence and alleging contributory negligence as an affirmative defense. After two days of trial, the parties entered into a settlement agreement by which appellant released and dismissed respondents Flynn and Venturini in consideration of the payment of $7,000.
Respondent State Compensation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Troxell v. TroxellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Eldridge v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Casner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Olson v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Johnson v. L. D. S. Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by13 opinions
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re Marriage of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Carden v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Walsh v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.