Legal Opinion

State v. . Long

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1907PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant's counsel moved to quash the bill of indictment upon the grounds:

1. That the bill is defective in that it failed to charge the date of either of the alleged marriages.

2. That the bill is defective, because it fails to allege where and when the second marriage took place.

3. That the bill is defective, as it failed to allege that the former wife had not been divorced, or that she had not been out of the State and knowledge of the defendant for seven years.

4. That the bill is defective, because the foreman of the grand jury did not sign the instrument on the back of the bill,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Townsend v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. State v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. Blackley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. BatdorfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API