Legal Opinion

State v. Sultan.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1906PublishedCited by 41 opinions

INDICTMENT for illegal sale of spirituous liquors, against William Sultan, beard by Judge B. F. Long and a jury, at the April Term, 1906, of the Superior Court of Cbayen. From a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClase, C. J.

The defendant had been arrested, in October, 1905, under a justice’s warrant for the same illegal act herein charged, but procuring a continuance, gave the prosecuting witness $135 to depart the State, in consequence whereof the proceeding before the justice was dismissed. On 12 April, 1906, the witness having returned, the grand jury found a true bill. The defendant had just-been tried that day upon another charge of like nature — the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor1 — and was in court awaiting the verdict therein, when the bill in this case was returned. The defendant had been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Scott v. ChopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Musick v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. S. v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  5. State v. . SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API