State v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: Going directly to the exceptions, and considering them in the order above set out, we may say that the refusal of the trial court to grant the defendants’ request for a continuance on account of the illness of counsel, was a matter resting in his sound discretion and is not subject to review on appeal, except in case of manifest abuse. In re Bank, 202 N. C., 251, S. v. Rhodes, 202 N. C., 101; S. v. Sauls, 190 N. C., 810, 130 S. E., 848. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear on the present record. S. v. Riley, 188 N. C., 72, 123 S. E., 303. True,…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Cantrell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.