Legal Opinion

Kershman v. Kershman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1961No. Civ. 25085PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an action for the partition of real property. Defendant appeals from an interlocutory decree of partition adjudging him the owner in fee of an undivided 6.7 per cent interest in the property.

This action was tried together with an action for divorce in which plaintiff prevailed (Kershman v. Kershman, ante, p. 18 [13 Cal.Rptr. 288]).

Plaintiff and defendant, described in the briefs as mature persons, were married December 24, 1950, and separated October 24, 1958. At the time of the marriage plaintiff owned a parcel of improved real property located at 1630 North Genessee Street, Los…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Demetris v. DemetrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hill v. DonnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Cosler v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sack v. TomlinNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Milian v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Langevin v. YorkNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Barajas v. Triola CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API