Legal Opinion

Armbrust v. United Telephone Co. of Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1997No. CA96-08-079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Koehler, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Robert M. and Maureen Armbrust, appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, United Telephone Company of Ohio, Inc.; A.D.T. Security Systems, Inc.; and Desili Enterprises, Inc., d.b.a. Burger King, in the Warren County Court of Common Pleas. We affirm.

Appellants filed a complaint for personal injury after Robert Armbrust (“Armbrust”) received an electric shock while using the public telephone at a Lebanon, Ohio Burger King on April 14, 1993. Each of the three appellees filed cross-claims against the other two, claiming…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Mercy Health Partners N., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Breazeale v. Infrastructure & Dev. Eng., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API