Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Bromley Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1898No. 18,420PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by the Bromley Manufacturing Company and three others against Heiman Barnett and three others, and judgment was rendered in favor of said plaintiffs below.

Prom said judgment, the defendants in the court below appealed. The parties are designated in the assignment of errors as follows: “The Bromley Manufacturing Company et al., appellees, v. Heiman Barnett et al., appellants.” Rule six of this court requires that “The assignment of errors shall -contain the full names of all the parties.” This rule has. not been complied with. Besides the names of the appellants should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Big Four Building & Loan Ass'n v. OlcottIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Jenkins v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Gunn v. HaworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lauster v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Smith v. FairfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API