Legal Opinion

Gromack v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 7, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*134The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kole, J. A. D.

This appeal by the employer, Johns-Man-ville Products Corporation (JM), from the amount of counsel fees awarded petitioner’s attorney by the Division of Workers’ Compensation requires a consideration of the standards to be applied by that Division in fixing such fees and the scope of our appellate review thereof.

In a real sense the fee payable to petitioner’s attorney (hereafter “the attorney”) is contingent in nature. If there is no compensation awarded to petitioner, the attorney receives no fee for his services. In no event may a fee…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. Plaza FordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. QUERESHI v. Cintas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  3. Akef v. BASF Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Greenberg v. O'GormanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. JENNIFER A. MACHEMER VS. CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL (DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API