Legal Opinion
Akef v. BASF Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 21, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PAUL G. LEVY, J.A.D.
We first considered this matter in 1994 when we held that liability for petitioner’s permanent disability, based on acute bronchial asthma and its associated psychiatric disabilities, was solely the responsibility of Celotex, as his last employer, not subject to apportionment between or among BASF or The Second Injury Fund. We also held then that petitioner had proved a claim for azoospermia (sterility) and its associated psychiatric disability, for which BASF was solely responsible. Akef v. BASF Corp., 275 N.J.Super. 30, 645 A.2d…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Saunderlin v. E.I. Dupont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Everhart v. Newark Cleaning & Dyeing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Acikgoz v. NJ Turnpike AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007