Legal Opinion
Guenther v. Holt
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 27, 1999No. 98-6296, 98-6297PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
jn tw0 cases consolidated for this appeal, the district court dismissed the petitioners’ applications for a writ of habe-as corpus as second or successive and refused to transfer the applications to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Because such a transfer could not have helped one of the petitioners, and was unnecessary with respect to the other, we decline to decide the issue of whether a § 1631 transfer was potentially available and, if so, whether it should have been made.
Between 1990 and 1994, Guenther filed two applications 1 and Jackson filed one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Jonathan Sims, Janice v. TerbushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Miguel Dejesus Liriano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Pratt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Wilcox v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Leantry Benton v. Odie WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re ClineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Tony Bruce Bennett v. Christopher Artuz, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.