Legal Opinion

American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 1647 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 2004No. 03-4553PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Local 1647 of the American Federation of Government Employees (“AFGE” or the “union”), proposed a contractual provision that would have allowed employees at the Tobyhanna Army Depot (“TYAD”) to be reimbursed from the TYAD Army Working Capital Fund (“AWCF”) for personal expenses they sustained as a result of cancelled annual leave. Respondent Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA”) held the proposal was nonnegotiable because it would require an impermissible expenditure of congressionally appropriated funds. The FLRA specifically…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Reeside v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Bhatti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  3. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Morgan Drexen, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
  5. Figueroa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API