Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. Redd
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Russell county, in an action of trespass oh the case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
In this action for malicious prosecution S. M. Redd, herein referred to as the plaintiff, recovered against the Clinchfield Coal Corporation, herein referred to as the defendant, a verdict for $1,800, and the trial court, in accordance therewith, rendered the judgment under review.'
The evidence was in some respects conflicting, but was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding the following material facts: The plaintiff, whose home was at Gate City, Virginia, was a member of the firm of Vaughan & Redd, contractors, engaged at the time of the alleged grievance, July, 1916, in constructing a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McKain v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. KlaffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Tredway's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Graves v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Forbes & Allers v. HagmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Giant of Virginia, Inc. v. PiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Supervalu, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- W. T. Grant Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.