Legal Opinion

Hallman v. City of Pampa

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1941No. 5246PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLEY, Justice.

This suit was filed by the appellant, Roy Hallman, against the appellee, City of Pampa, a municipal corporation, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been suffered by Hallman’s wife when she fell in a street in Pampa which the appellee was paving, the fall alleged to have been caused by her stumbling over debris which had accumulated in 'the street during the course of the construction work. The City of Pampa answered with numerous exceptions and demurrers to appellant’s petition, and the action of the court upon the same amounted to the sustaining of a general…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. City of Dallas v. ShowsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Haltom CityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bowman v. Lumberton Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Southwestern Associated Tel. Co. v. City of DalhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Austin Neighborhoods Council, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API