Legal Opinion

Turner v. . Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following were the issues submitted to the jury and the responses thereto:

"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant? Answer: `Yes.'
"2. If so, did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury? Answer: `No.'
"3. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: `$500.'"

S. S. Turner, the plaintiff testified as follows:

"I was injured 25 September, 1894. I was working for the defendant at Dover. I had worked for them nine days. I loaded cars three days and worked around the planing machine five days. Two of these days I helped a boy take…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Pomfrey v. . Village of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Emery v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Hinshaw v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Alko-Nak Coal Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Dial v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Russell v. Champion Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
  5. Cogdill v. Whiting Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API