Legal Opinion
Turner v. . Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following were the issues submitted to the jury and the responses thereto:
"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant? Answer: `Yes.'
"2. If so, did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury? Answer: `No.'
"3. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: `$500.'"
S. S. Turner, the plaintiff testified as follows:
"I was injured 25 September, 1894. I was working for the defendant at Dover. I had worked for them nine days. I loaded cars three days and worked around the planing machine five days. Two of these days I helped a boy take…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pomfrey v. . Village of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Emery v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Hinshaw v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Alko-Nak Coal Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Dial v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Russell v. Champion Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Cogdill v. Whiting Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914