Dial v. Wilke
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLEY, Justice.
This is án appeal from the judgment upon a directed verdict in favor of the appellee, Adolph Wilke, in a suit wherein the appellant, William Dial, sought damages for injuries received by him when his hand was caught between two cog wheels of a commercial cane crushing machine or syrup mill alleged to have been owned and operated by the appellee.
The cane crusher was located near the town of Southland, Texas. It was a steel stationary machine motored from a tractor by means of a belt. The tractor stood some ten feet north of the mill. The cane was fed into the mill from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. MarlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Phipps v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- United East & West Oil Co. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.