Legal Opinion

Dial v. Wilke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1939No. 5009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLEY, Justice.

This is án appeal from the judgment upon a directed verdict in favor of the appellee, Adolph Wilke, in a suit wherein the appellant, William Dial, sought damages for injuries received by him when his hand was caught between two cog wheels of a commercial cane crushing machine or syrup mill alleged to have been owned and operated by the appellee.

The cane crusher was located near the town of Southland, Texas. It was a steel stationary machine motored from a tractor by means of a belt. The tractor stood some ten feet north of the mill. The cane was fed into the mill from the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. MarlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  3. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  4. Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Phipps v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. United East & West Oil Co. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API