Legal Opinion
Callas v. Whisper, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeldock, J.
Defendants move under subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency.
*830The complaint alleges that defendant Harrison owned and published a group of magazines, one of which is called “ Whisper ” whose “ articles, captions, sub-captions, photographs and contents sensationalized sexual diversion, sexual abnormalities, and lurid articles and photographs ”. The complaint further alleges that the defendant corporations and individuals had associated interests in such publication. It is asserted that these defendants conspired to induce the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Lahiri v. Daily Mirror, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Damron v. Doubleday, Doran & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Colyer v. Richard K. Fox Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Wallach v. BacharachNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Paulsen v. Personality Posters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- Russell v. BooksNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Dallesandro v. Henry Holt & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Goelet v. Confidential, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.