Legal Opinion

Dallesandro v. Henry Holt & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1957PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*471 Per Curiam.

Defendant displayed a picture on the cover of “ Waterfront Priest ”, a book it published, that showed Father Corridan, the subject of the book, in conversation with plaintiff, a longshoreman and rank-and-file union member. We do not believe the use of this picture comes within the proscription of sections 50 and 51 of the Civil Eights Law.

A picture illustrating an article on a matter of public interest is not considered used for the purpose of trade or advertising within the prohibition of the statute (Gautier v. Pro-Football, 304 N. Y. 354, 359) unless it has no real relationship…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Lahiri v. Daily Mirror, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Humiston v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Oma v. Hillman Periodicals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Stephano v. News Group Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & PublishingNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Finger v. Omni Publications International., Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API