Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Ribar

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1992No. C.A. No. 2059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Presiding Judge.

This case is before the court on the trial court’s denial of the petitioner Roger R. Ingraham’s request for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, John Ribar, the Sheriff of Medina County, to release records relating to the 1977 death of Pamela Terrill. Petitioner brought the suit pursuant to R.C. 149.43, commonly referred to as the “Public Records Act.”

Following the commencement of this suit, the respondent released numerous documents requested by the petitioner, but refused to release other documents, claiming that they were excepted under R.C. 149.43. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Polovischak v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Williams v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. TregliaOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Savransky v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Court of Claims · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API