Global Sourcing Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
Plaintiff Global Sourcing Group, Inc. (“Global”) moves for summary judgment, arguing that its imported merchandise, described by both parties as “binders,” was not properly classified by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”). Defendant United States (the “Government”), contests the court’s jurisdiction over two specific binder models, asking the court specifically to (1) dismiss part of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) deny Global’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) set the balance of the action for trial. In the alternative, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Cutter & Buck, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Graphite Sales v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Sparks Belting Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010