Legal Opinion

Airco, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 16, 1979No. C.R.D. 79-9; Court No. 76-3-00643Published

1Opinion of the Court

*346Opinion to Accompany Order

Richardson, Judge:

This is an action to review a negative countervailing duty determination of the Secretary of the Treasury, authorized under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1516(d), in which plaintiff moves to depose defendant through its agents, Lynn J. Barden, an attorney-adviser in the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and R. Theodore Hume, an Assistant Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs Service (formerly an attorney-adviser in the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of the Treasury), and to depose one Peter 0. Suchman, formerly Deputy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  2. United States v. Kurtz, Stuböeck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. Macy & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API