Legal Opinion

Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 21, 1963No. C.D. 2413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONLON, Judge.

The merchandise involved in this case consists of combed worsted wool tops of various grades, exported from Uruguay between May 16, 1953, and September 11, 1953, and entered at the port of Philadelphia between June 23, 1953, and October 16, 1953. In addition to the assessment of regular duties, concerning which no question has been raised, countervailing duties were levied pursuant to section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303) and T.D. 53257 at the rate of 18 per centum of the invoice value of the merchandise and any dutiable charges thereon.

The assessment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Cramer v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. United States v. KlingenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Airco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API