Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Macy & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 21, 1925No. 2247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The appellee caused to be filed in the office of the chief clerk of the Board of General Appraisers a writing, purporting to be a petition for remission under section 489, Tariff Act of 1922, which writing is as follows:

Board of United States General Appraisers

In the matter of entry No. 766313, of R. H. Macy & Co. (Inc.) on silk-lined baskets.

Application for Remission of Penalties

Application is herewith made, under section 489, part 3, Title IV, of the Tariff Act of 1922, for the remission of penalties in the matter above noted, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Eighty-Four Boxes of SugarSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. United States v. American Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Heap v. ParrishIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shaft v. . Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Fenstermacher v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. United States v. BracherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Western Electric Co.United States Customs Court · 1951
  4. United States v. International Graphite & Electrode Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  5. Airco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API