Legal Opinion
Darrel A. Mazzari, and Michael T. Sheedy v. James E. Rogan, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 17, 2003No. 02-1269PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Darrel A. Mazzari and Michael T. Sheedy appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Mazzari v. Dir., Patent and Trademark Office, 99-CV-142 (D.D.C. Dec. 20, 2001), on summary judgment in favor of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) that Mazzari and Sheedy’s claims are unpatentable. Because no genuine issue of material fact as to the grounds of rejection exists and the district court correctly held the claims obvious and anticipated in light of the pri- or art, the judgment is affirmed.
Background
Mazzari and Sheedy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dynacore Holdings Corp. v. U.S. Philips Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Liquid Dynamics Corporation v. Vaughan Company, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Typeright Keyboard Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.