Branham v. Spurgis
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s pro se complaint stems from a misconduct hearing conducted by defendant in October of 1988. Read liberally, plaintiff’s complaint alleges that he was denied due process of law when defendant refused to accept plaintiff’s relevant documents at the misconduct hearing. Plaintiff seeks declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief.
Both parties have moved for summary judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, supporting their motions with copies of the misconduct report, the hearing…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Leonard v. WallaceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Alger v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Moltan Company v. Eagle-Picher IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995