Legal Opinion
Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1995No. Nos. 94-5345, 94-6472PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Both Moltan and Eagle-Picher manufacture diatomaceous earth oil absorbent products (“DE products”). In September 1993, Moltan filed suit against Eagle-Picher, accusing it of defamation and commercial disparagement, among other things. Eagle-Picher denied these allegations and filed a counter-claim against Moltan, accusing Mol-tan of engaging in false advertising and la-belling. Eagle-Picher requested that the District Court issue a preliminary injunction ordering Moltan to cease making its allegedly false claims. The District Court issued the injunction, and Moltan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- William MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. James H. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- City of Chi. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.