Legal Opinion

Quedding v. Arisumi Bros., Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1983No. 8197PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this appeal from a judgment for Plaintiffs Robert and Sandra Quedding (the Queddings) in a breach of contract action are three jury instructions and the assessment of special, general, and punitive damages against Defendant-appellant Arisumi Brothers, Inc. (Arisumi). Concluding that $12,964.40 for repairs to the Quedding residence represents a reasonable sum in light of the evidence, we affirm the award of special damages. But the trial judge erred in instructing the jury that it could find Arisumi breached the contract in a “wanton or reckless manner,” for the evidence in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kang v. HarringtonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Orso v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brown v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City and County of Honolulu v. BennettHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Morrow v. L. A. Goldschmidt Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API