Delconte v. State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Plaintiff educates his children at home. The dispositive question for decision is whether plaintiffs home instruction is prohibited by our compulsory school attendance statutes. 1 We conclude that it is not. We do not, therefore, reach the question whether these statutes would violate plaintiffs constitutional freedoms if they prohibited him from so educating his children.
I
Delconte instituted this action seeking a declaratory judgment that his home instruction was not prohibited by our statutes on school attendance and, if it was, then these statutes contravened certain freedoms…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PetersilieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- State v. PatzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Mazanec v. North Judson-San Pierre School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.