Black v. Brundige
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUMONT, J., pro tem.
In 1925 Roy S. Brundige was a builder of houses in the vicinity of Los Angeles. There were five lots in Beverly Hills he believed desirable for his business. The value of these lots was $25,000, but they could be purchased for $19,750 cash. He interviewed Lud wig G. B. Erb, respondent herein, for the purpose of obtaining funds with which to buy the lots. A contract was entered into on September 16, 1925, between respondent and Brundige. This agreement stated that Brundige had applied to respondent for money with which to purchase certain lots, describing them. Respondent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. PeytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dwinel v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
- Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dennis v. KolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Holmes v. LernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Denning v. TaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- McGurk v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.