Legal Opinion

Moore v. Deputy Commissioner(S) Of Sci-Huntingdon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 8, 1991No. 91-5224PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

946 F.2d 236

Nathaniel MOORE

v.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(S) OF SCI-HUNTINGDON; Attorney General

for the State of Pennsylvania; Henry S.

Kenderdine, Jr., D.A. of Lancaster County

Deputy Commissioner of the State Correctional Institution at

Huntingdon and the Attorney General of the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellants.

No. 91-5224.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 3, 1991.

Decided Oct. 8, 1991.

Joseph C. Madenspacher (argued), First Asst. Dist. Atty., Heidi F. Carter, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lancaster, Pa., for appellants.

James V. Wade, Federal Public Defender, Daniel I. Siegel…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Thomas v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Roscoe Parrish v. Thomas Fulcomer, Warden, Sci Huntingdon the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Jackson v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Stewart v. State by and Through DelandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API