Legal Opinion

Roscoe Parrish v. Thomas Fulcomer, Warden, Sci Huntingdon the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pa

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 31, 1998No. 98-1010PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Roscoe Parrish waived his right to a jury trial in return for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s agreement not to seek the death penalty. He was convicted of first degree murder and criminal conspiracy and was sentenced to life in prison. In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and before us, Parrish argues that waiver of his federal constitutional right to a jury trial, induced by the prosecution’s pledge not to seek the death penalty, violated his federal constitutional right to due process. He further contends that his trial counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Cyrus R. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Judge v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Ronald Rompilla v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Martin Horn, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. State v. FeregrinoSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API